Legislature(2001 - 2002)
2002-04-11 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2002-04-11 House Journal Page 2889 SB 291 HCS CSSB 291(FIN) am H was before the House with Amendment No. 2 as amended pending. Representative Croft placed a call of the House and lifted the call. Representatives Crawford, Davies, and Kerttula moved and asked unanimous consent that they be allowed to abstain from voting due to a conflict of interest. Objection was heard, and the members were required to vote. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 2 as amended be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: HCS CSSB 291(FIN) am H Second Reading Amendment No. 2 as amended YEAS: 17 NAYS: 19 EXCUSED: 4 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Berkowitz, Cissna, Crawford, Croft, Davies, Guess, Halcro, Hayes, Joule, Kapsner, Kerttula, Kookesh, McGuire, Moses, Murkowski, Stevens, Wilson Nays: Bunde, Chenault, Coghill, Dyson, Harris, Hudson, James, Kohring, Kott, Lancaster, Masek, Meyer, Morgan, Mulder, Porter, Rokeberg, Scalzi, Whitaker, Williams Excused: Fate, Foster, Green, Ogan Whitaker changed from "Yea" to "Nay". And so, Amendment No. 2 as amended was not adopted. 2002-04-11 House Journal Page 2890 Amendment No. 3 and Amendment No. 4 were not offered. Amendment No. 5 was offered by Representative Davies: Page 3, line 6, following "SAFETY.": Insert "(a)" Page 3, following line 9: Insert a new subsection to read: "(b) The sum of $288,200 is appropriated from the general fund to the Department of Public Safety for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2002, for the costs incurred in operating the Yukon River checkpoint." Page 4, line 28, following "increase": Insert "; (5) the sum of $66,900 is appropriated for Valdez airport security; (6) the sum of $42,200 is appropriated for the Fox weigh station" Representative Davies moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 5 be adopted. Representative Mulder objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 5 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: HCS CSSB 291(FIN) am H Second Reading Amendment No. 5 YEAS: 12 NAYS: 24 EXCUSED: 4 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Berkowitz, Cissna, Crawford, Croft, Davies, Guess, Hayes, Joule, Kapsner, Kerttula, Kookesh, Moses Nays: Bunde, Chenault, Coghill, Dyson, Halcro, Harris, Hudson, James, Kohring, Kott, Lancaster, Masek, McGuire, Meyer, Morgan, Mulder, Murkowski, Porter, Rokeberg, Scalzi, Stevens, Whitaker, Williams, Wilson 2002-04-11 House Journal Page 2891 Excused: Fate, Foster, Green, Ogan And so, Amendment No. 5 was not adopted. Amendment No. 6 was offered by Representatives Wilson and Kerttula: Page 2, line 9: Delete: "2,038,500" Insert: "2,876,900" Representative Wilson moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 6 be adopted. Representative Mulder objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 6 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: HCS CSSB 291(FIN) am H Second Reading Amendment No. 6 YEAS: 12 NAYS: 23 EXCUSED: 4 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Berkowitz, Cissna, Crawford, Davies, Hayes, Hudson, Joule, Kapsner, Kerttula, Kookesh, Moses, Wilson Nays: Bunde, Chenault, Coghill, Croft, Dyson, Guess, Halcro, Harris, James, Kohring, Kott, Lancaster, Masek, Meyer, Morgan, Mulder, Murkowski, Porter, Rokeberg, Scalzi, Stevens, Whitaker, Williams Excused: Fate, Foster, Green, Ogan Absent: McGuire And so, Amendment No. 6 was not adopted. Amendment No. 7 was offered by Representative Davies: Page 3, line 1, following "EQUALIZATION." Insert "(a)" 2002-04-11 House Journal Page 2892 Page 3, following line 5: Insert new subsections to read: "(b) The sum of $1,100,000 is appropriated from the general fund to the power cost equalization and rural electric capitalization fund (AS 42.45.100). (c) The sum of $1,100,000 is appropriated from the power cost equalization and rural electric capitalization fund (AS 42.45.100) to the Department of Community & Economic Development for the power cost equalization program for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2002." Page 7, line 4, following "9": Insert "(a) and (b)" Page 7, line 8: Delete "appropriation" Insert "appropriations" Page 7, line 8, following "Act" Delete "is" Insert "are" Representative Davies moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 7 be adopted. Representative Mulder objected. Representative Joule moved and asked unanimous consent that he be allowed to abstain from voting due to a conflict of interest. Objection was heard, and Representative Joule was required to vote. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 7 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: HCS CSSB 291(FIN) am H Second Reading Amendment No. 7 YEAS: 14 NAYS: 22 EXCUSED: 4 ABSENT: 0 2002-04-11 House Journal Page 2893 Yeas: Berkowitz, Cissna, Crawford, Croft, Davies, Guess, Hayes, Joule, Kapsner, Kerttula, Kookesh, Morgan, Moses, Wilson Nays: Bunde, Chenault, Coghill, Dyson, Halcro, Harris, Hudson, James, Kohring, Kott, Lancaster, Masek, McGuire, Meyer, Mulder, Murkowski, Porter, Rokeberg, Scalzi, Stevens, Whitaker, Williams Excused: Fate, Foster, Green, Ogan Morgan changed from "Nay" to "Yea". And so, Amendment No. 7 was not adopted. Representative James moved and asked unanimous consent that HCS CSSB 291(FIN) am H be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading, and placed on final passage. There being no objection, it was so ordered. HCS CSSB 291(FIN) am H was read the third time. The question being: "Shall HCS CSSB 291(FIN) am H pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: HCS CSSB 291(FIN) am H Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 33 NAYS: 3 EXCUSED: 4 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Bunde, Chenault, Coghill, Crawford, Croft, Davies, Dyson, Guess, Halcro, Harris, Hayes, Hudson, James, Joule, Kapsner, Kerttula, Kohring, Kott, Lancaster, Masek, McGuire, Meyer, Morgan, Moses, Mulder, Murkowski, Porter, Rokeberg, Scalzi, Stevens, Whitaker, Williams, Wilson Nays: Berkowitz, Cissna, Kookesh Excused: Fate, Foster, Green, Ogan And so, HCS CSSB 291(FIN) am H passed the House. Representative James moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the effective date clause. 2002-04-11 House Journal Page 2894 Representative Berkowitz objected. The question being: "Shall the effective date clause be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: HCS CSSB 291(FIN) am H Third Reading Effective Date YEAS: 36 NAYS: 0 EXCUSED: 4 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Berkowitz, Bunde, Chenault, Cissna, Coghill, Crawford, Croft, Davies, Dyson, Guess, Halcro, Harris, Hayes, Hudson, James, Joule, Kapsner, Kerttula, Kohring, Kookesh, Kott, Lancaster, Masek, McGuire, Meyer, Morgan, Moses, Mulder, Murkowski, Porter, Rokeberg, Scalzi, Stevens, Whitaker, Williams, Wilson Excused: Fate, Foster, Green, Ogan And so, the effective date clause was adopted. HCS CSSB 291(FIN) am H was referred to the Chief Clerk for engrossment.